Please fill out the form below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.
Your invoice is three months old, the buyer’s accounts team has stopped replying, and your CA wants to know whether you intend to “go legal”. Before you budget for a lawyer, look at what the MSMED Act already gives you. A registered micro or small enterprise has a statutory right to be paid within a fixed period, and to compound interest the moment that period lapses. MSME delayed payment recovery runs through a Facilitation Council reference filed on MSME Samadhaan, not through a civil suit. What follows is the paperwork, the arithmetic and the enforcement, in the order you will meet them.
The trigger is Section 15 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, and it does not work the way most suppliers assume. The buyer must pay on or before the date agreed in writing or, where there is no written agreement, before the “appointed day”. The proviso caps any agreed credit period at forty-five days from the day of acceptance or the day of deemed acceptance. Read the two together and 45 days is a ceiling, not a default. If you never signed payment terms, your money fell due far earlier.
Section 2(b) defines the appointed day as the day following the expiry of fifteen days from the day of acceptance or deemed acceptance. The explanation to that clause defines the day of acceptance as the date of actual delivery of goods or rendering of services or, where the buyer raises a written objection to acceptance within fifteen days, the date on which the supplier removes that objection. Deemed acceptance is simply the date of delivery where no written objection is raised inside fifteen days.
That last sentence carries weight. A complaint shouted down the phone does nothing. Only a written objection inside fifteen days postpones the clock, and once it is postponed the supplier controls the date by clearing it.
| What the contract says | When payment falls due |
|---|---|
| Written credit period of 45 days or less | On the agreed date |
| Written credit period longer than 45 days | 45 days from acceptance or deemed acceptance |
| No written agreement on payment terms | Day after 15 days from acceptance or deemed acceptance |
Section 17 then makes the buyer liable to pay the amount together with interest under Section 16. That is what a Council acts on, and it is why a reference under Section 18 is a statutory claim rather than a negotiation.
Section 16 makes the buyer liable for compound interest with monthly rests on the unpaid amount, from the appointed day or the date immediately following the agreed date, at three times the bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank of India. The sub-section opens with “notwithstanding anything contained in any agreement between the buyer and the supplier or in any law for the time being in force”. A purchase-order clause promising simple interest, or no interest, does not survive it.
The bank rate moves with the policy repo rate. Check the rate in force on the date you compute, on the RBI website, rather than relying on a figure you remember from last year. Note also that the interest keeps running after the award, until the money actually reaches you.
Meridian Precision Components Pvt Ltd is a small enterprise in Coimbatore with a valid Udyam certificate. It supplies machined brackets to an auto-parts company in Pune. Invoice dated 1 May 2025 for ₹10,00,000 plus GST. Goods delivered on 3 May 2025 against a signed challan and an e-way bill. The signed purchase order gives 60 days for payment. No written objection to the goods was ever raised.
The 60-day term does not hold, because it exceeds the statutory ceiling. Payment fell due 45 days after 3 May 2025, that is on 17 June 2025, and interest runs from the following day.
Assume, purely for illustration, a bank rate of 5.50%, making the statutory rate 16.5% a year, or 1.375% a month. Twelve monthly rests on ₹10,00,000 turn the claim into roughly ₹11,78,000, about ₹1.78 lakh of interest on top of the principal. Simple interest at the same rate would have produced about ₹1.65 lakh. The difference is the price the Act puts on delay.

The first question the Council asks is not whether the buyer owes you money. It is whether you are a “supplier” under Section 2(n), meaning a micro or small enterprise that has filed a memorandum under Section 8. In practice that means a Udyam registration certificate. A medium enterprise cannot use Sections 15 to 19 at all, and a firm without Udyam registration sits outside them however small it is in reality.
After that, the reference is decided on paper. Assemble the Udyam certificate with its registration date; the purchase order or signed contract; the tax invoice with HSN or SAC codes; proof of delivery such as a signed challan, lorry receipt or service completion certificate; a ledger extract certified by an authorised signatory; bank statements for the relevant months showing no corresponding credit; the GSTR-1 for the period, which shows the invoice was reported as a supply; and the reminder trail with postal proof.
Suppliers routinely undermine their own claim by computing interest from the invoice date instead of the appointed day or the agreed date. Others file with an invoice and a bank statement but no delivery proof, leaving the buyer free to allege short supply. Clubbing invoices to two different buyers into one reference invites procedural argument. And waiting has a cost: the Act is silent on limitation, and three years from the due date is generally applied, so an old file may not be worth the filing effort.
The reference goes to the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council of the State or Union Territory where you are located. Section 18(4) gives that Council jurisdiction over a buyer sitting anywhere in India, so the Coimbatore supplier can proceed against the Pune buyer without travelling.
Filing is online through the MSME Samadhaan portal. Once the reference is registered, the Council first attempts conciliation under Section 18(2), applying Sections 65 to 81 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. If conciliation fails and stands terminated without a settlement, Section 18(3) requires the Council either to take up the dispute for arbitration itself or to refer it to an institution, after which the 1996 Act governs the arbitration.
Confirm your Udyam certificate was in force on the date of supply
Place the purchase order, invoice, e-way bill and signed delivery proof in one folder
Compute the due date under Section 15 and the Section 16 interest up to filing
Write a one-page chronology of dates with no adjectives and no speculation
Register on MSME Samadhaan and enter each invoice separately with its own due date
Upload scanned PDFs rather than photographs of paper on a desk
Send a final demand letter before the first hearing and keep the postal proof
An award by the Council, or by an institution it refers the dispute to, is an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and is enforced as a decree of a court. The buyer’s real obstacle, though, is Section 19. No court can entertain an application to set aside the award unless the appellant, where it is not the supplier, has deposited 75% of the amount in terms of the award in the manner the court directs. The proviso lets the court order that a reasonable percentage of that deposit be paid to the supplier while the challenge is pending.
So a buyer who files a half-hearted challenge must still fund three-quarters of the award. That single feature is why most Council awards end in settlement rather than years of litigation. Note the direction of the condition: the deposit binds the buyer as appellant, not the supplier.
The Finance Act, 2023 inserted clause (h) in Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, with effect from assessment year 2024-25. Any sum payable by an assessee to a micro or small enterprise beyond the time limit in Section 15 of the MSMED Act is allowed as a deduction only in the year of actual payment. The right to deduct is deferred, not denied.
Two details are worth carrying into your demand letter. The clause speaks of a supplier as defined in Section 2(n) of the MSMED Act, so your Udyam position is the buyer’s tax problem as well as yours. And the trigger is non-payment within the Section 15 limit, not the levy of interest. A buyer who is buying time for cash-flow reasons is usually buying a higher tax bill in the same breath. Say so, politely, in writing.
If the reminders have run their course, fix the due date on each invoice, compute interest to date, and file the reference on MSME Samadhaan this week rather than at the end of the quarter. The clock has been running for months; nothing is gained by letting it run further.
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified professional for your specific facts.
0 Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.
Leave a Comment